Li Tu vs Nathan Eshmade Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tu vs Eshmade analysis and find out who is favored!
Li Tu vs Nathan Eshmade Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tu 0 - 0 Eshmade
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tu has won 52.67% of points on their second serve, while Eshmade has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tu, in recent form, has won 52.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eshmade has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tu has saved 65.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eshmade has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tu has won 55.71% of matches played (W/L 39/ 31), with Eshmade winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 109/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Eshmade has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 32/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.73% of matches (W/L 21/ 23), where as Eshmade has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tu has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.73 while Eshmade has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tu has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eshmade has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tu has converted 35.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eshmade has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
202
Rank
186
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
Form
62% (163-98)
Career Total W/L
51% (36-35)
55% (17-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$139,510
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Li Tu vs Nathan Eshmade For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tu VS Eshmade
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Li Tu | Nathan Eshmade |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (17/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (38/31) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (356/328) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
Aces Total | 136 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
DFs Total | 45 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:24 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 242.32 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1317/1991) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (938/1317) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (355/674) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (69/196) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (817/2132) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 29% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 90% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Valentin Royer
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Li Tu
75%
(
91 of
122)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
15
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Hamish Stewart
79%
(
61 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Li Tu
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Oliver Crawford
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Nathan Eshmade Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-1 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nathan Eshmade
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Nathan Eshmade
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Nathan Eshmade
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benard Bruno Nkomba
Player
Nathan Eshmade
40%
(
25 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
14
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vasile Antonescu
Player
Nathan Eshmade
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
14
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrei Stefan Apostol
Player
Nathan Eshmade
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
13
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julian Onken
Player
Nathan Eshmade
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Tu Vs Eshmade Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tu are available here and Eshmade photos here.
![Tu Eshmade H2h Summary Stats 26th June 2024 Tu Eshmade H2h Summary Stats 26th June 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Li-Tu-Nathan-Eshmade-h2h-profile.webp)
![Li Tu Nathan Eshmade Prediction Stats Li Tu Nathan Eshmade Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Li-Tu-Nathan-Eshmade-h2h-stats.webp)